Computers and monitors (migration)

(M1) REFERENCE M1) Subject to Article 65 (1) (b) of the Kbt., the applicant shall have a reference completed within 36 months of the date of dispatch of the invitation to tender, but starting not later than 72 months after the date of dispatch of the invitation to initiate the procedure, within the meaning of Article 21 (1) (a) of Regulation No 21 of the Korm.

Pursuant to Article 21 / A of the Korm Regulation, the AK is obliged to accept as proof of performance that the result or activity of the reference requirement has been achieved as part of the contract. The AK is also obliged to accept evidence of the performance achieved where, although there is a breach of contract, the economic operator's liability for breach of contract, not contested by the other party concluding the contract, does not exist.

Identification method: Preliminary certificate: Article 1 (1) of the Corm. regulation In accordance with Chapter II of the Korm.Regulation, the applicant shall provide prior proof that he meets the competence requirements set by AK, by submitting the EEKD. AK adopts a simple declaration by economic operators pursuant to Article 2 (5) of the corm.Regulation. (Tender must complete section alpha of Part IV of the EEKD, not further section A-D of Part IV).

Paragraph 69 (4) and (6). on the basis of a decision on the outcome of the procedure, the AK is considered to be most favourable in the light of the assessment criteria or Article 69 (6) Kbt. In its decision on the basis of the assessment order, the following number of most favourable Contracting Parties shall be invited to submit the following declarations: M1) reference declaration or certificate. The reference shall be certified in accordance with Article 22 (1) to (2) of the Korm.Regulation.

The reference declaration or certificate shall contain at least the following information: time of delivery (year / month / day), the serve. the other party, the subject matter, the quantity of the service, and the applicant shall declare whether the performance has been carried out in accordance with the requirements.

Where the performance has not been carried out in accordance with the contract, the reasons and the extent of the derogation in the certificate or declaration and, in the event of a breach of the contract, the fact that the economic operator is liable for breach of contract shall be explained.

Where the certificate of suitability is made by a declaration of the tenderer or another organisation involved in the certificate of suitability, the declaration shall also state whether the other party to the contract disputes the nature of the performance or, where the economic operator has declared it, the fact that the economic operator is not liable for breach of contract.

(M1) The applicant is unfit if he does not have a reference to the certified and completed delivery of at least 100 computers completed during the 3 years (36 months) prior to the initiation of the procedure but within a maximum of 6 years (72 months). The applicant has defined the technical competence criteria more strictly than the list of qualified tenderers.

(M1) REFERENCE M1) Subject to Article 65 (1) (b) of the Kbt., the applicant shall have a reference completed within 36 months of the date of dispatch of the invitation to tender, but not later than 72 months, within the meaning of Article 21 (1) (a) of the Korm Regulation, whereby at least 200 monitors have been delivered.

Pursuant to Article 21 / A of the Korm Regulation, the AK is obliged to accept as proof of performance that the result or activity of the reference requirement has been achieved as part of the contract. The AK is also obliged to accept evidence of the performance achieved where, although there is a breach of contract, the economic operator's liability for breach of contract, not contested by the other party concluding the contract, does not exist.

Identification method: Preliminary certificate: Article 1 (1) of the Corm. regulation In accordance with Chapter II of the Korm.Regulation, the applicant shall provide prior proof that he meets the competence requirements set by AK, by submitting the EEKD. AK adopts a simple declaration by economic operators pursuant to Article 2 (5) of the corm.Regulation. (Tender must complete section alpha of Part IV of the EEKD, not further section A-D of Part IV).

Paragraph 69 (4) and (6). on the basis of a decision on the outcome of the procedure, the AK is considered to be most favourable in the light of the assessment criteria or Article 69 (6) Kbt. In its decision on the basis of the assessment order, the following number of most favourable Contracting Parties shall be invited to submit the following declarations: M1) reference declaration or certificate. The reference shall be certified in accordance with Article 22 (1) to (2) of the Korm.Regulation.

The reference declaration or certificate shall contain at least the following information: time of delivery (year / month / day), the serve. the other party, the subject matter, the quantity of the service, and the applicant shall declare whether the performance has been carried out in accordance with the requirements.

Where the performance has not been carried out in accordance with the contract, the reasons and the extent of the derogation in the certificate or declaration and, in the event of a breach of the contract, the fact that the economic operator is liable for breach of contract shall be explained.

Where the certificate of suitability is made by a declaration of the tenderer or another organisation involved in the certificate of suitability, the declaration shall also state whether the other party to the contract disputes the nature of the performance or, where the economic operator has declared it, the fact that the economic operator is not liable for breach of contract.

(M1) The applicant is unfit if he does not have a reference to the certified and completed transport of at least 200 monitors completed in the 3 years (36 months) preceding the initiation of the procedure but within a maximum of 6 years (72 months). The applicant has defined the technical competence criteria more strictly than the list of qualified tenderers.