Deadline changedTEDPolski

Project 1025 CSP Update, Evaluation, Recertification and API (CUERA)

Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der InformationstechnikBonn, GermanyNotice 718795-2026 · Reference number: P1025

At a glance

Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (Bonn, Germany) is tendering: Project 1025 CSP Update, Evaluation, Recertification and API (CUERA). Offers are due 3 Nov 2026, 10:00 CET. 13-month contract, 3 lots. Bidders must show, among other things: certificates, references.

Translated from the official notice. The original text is the legally binding one.

Key facts

Original deadline: 20 Oct 2026, 10:00 CEST
Deadline
not published
Estimated value
13 months
Duration
Open procedure
Procedure
19 Oct 2026
Published
718795-2026
Notice number
P1025
Reference number
IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support (72000000)
Main CPV
DEA22
Place of performance (NUTS)
3
Lots
not allowed
Variant offers
German
Language of offers

The buyer did not publish an estimated value in the notice.

Dates

Every date of the notice and its changes, in order. Times: Brussels / Warsaw.

The deadline for offers was changed once: from 20 Oct 2026, 10:00 CEST to 3 Nov 2026, 10:00 CET. The newest notice applies.

  1. Notice published

  2. Original deadline

  3. Deadline for offers

  4. Opening of offers

What the buyer wants

The objective in Lot 1 is the adaptation and updating of the protection profiles PP-CSP and PP-CSPL. In this process, the two protection profiles are to be merged using the multi-assurance approach. The new protection profile is to be designed modularly so that it can serve various purposes and enable broad application. The core of the PP is to be limited to the minimum necessary functionality of the CSP(L). All functionalities required only for specific purposes are to be separated into modules.

Dedicated PP configurations, which may each contain suitable combinations of functional modules, are to be developed for the individual application scenarios mentioned above. Within the lot, a concept draft will first be developed together with the contracting authority, followed by a description of the detailed architecture, and a further work package will focus on the actual creation of the PP.

The objective of the lot is an updated and modularized protection profile as well as at least one associated PP configuration for the cash registers and eID use case.

CPV codes

  • 72000000IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and supportmain

Lots (3)

The contract is divided into 3 lots. Offers may be submitted for selected lots where the documents allow it.

  1. Lot 1Lot 1: "Adjustment and Update of the CSP Protection Profile and CSPL Protection Profile (Update-CSPL)"

    Estimated value:
    not published
    Duration:
    13 months
    Place (NUTS):
    DEA22
    CPV:
    72000000 · IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support

    The objective in Lot 1 is the adaptation and updating of the protection profiles PP-CSP and PP-CSPL. In this process, the two protection profiles are to be merged using the multi-assurance approach. The new protection profile is to be designed modularly so that it can serve various purposes and enable broad application. The core of the PP is to be limited to the minimum necessary functionality of the CSP(L). All functionalities required only for specific purposes are to be separated into modules. Dedicated PP configurations, which may each contain suitable combinations of functional modules, are to be developed for the individual application scenarios mentioned above. Within the lot, a concept draft will first be developed together with the contracting authority, followed by a description of the detailed architecture, and a further work package will focus on the actual creation of the PP. The objective of the lot is an updated and modularized protection profile as well as at least one associated PP configuration for the cash registers and eID use case.

  2. Lot 2Lot 2: "Evaluation CSP-PP/CSPL-PP (Eval-CSPL)"

    Estimated value:
    not published
    Duration:
    4 months
    Place (NUTS):
    DEA22
    CPV:
    72000000 · IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support

    Auftragsgegenstand in Los 2 ist die Evaluierung des in Los 1 erstellten Schutzprofils. Ergebnis des Loses 2 sind vollständige Einzelprüfberichte, sodass die vorliegenden Berichte zur Zertifizierung des Schutzprofils und seiner Konfiguration eingereicht werden können und alle formalen Anforderungen erfüllt sind.

  3. Lot 3Lot 3: "Standardized Interface Description (API-CSPL)"

    Estimated value:
    not published
    Duration:
    8 months
    Place (NUTS):
    DEA22
    CPV:
    72000000 · IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support

    Ziel in Los 3 ist die Erstellung einer einheitlichen, standardisierten Schnittstellenbeschreibung für den CSP, sodass eine herstellerunabhängige Nutzung eines CSP auf einer sicheren Server-Architektur für externe Anwendungen ermöglicht wird. Die Grundlage für die Schnittstellenbeschreibung sollen die aktualisierten und modularisierten Schutzprofile, bzw. das zusammengeführte Schutzprofil aus Los 1 sein sowie die aktuelle BSI TR-CSP2.

Conditions for participation & required documents

What the notice asks bidders to prove, and the documents it requires. Full text below.

Conditions in the notice

  • CertificatesCompany or personnel certificates named in the notice
  • ReferencesSimilar contracts delivered before

Detected automatically in the published notice. Always confirm against the tender documents.

Show the notice text (8)

1.

Self-declaration of Article 5k of Regulation (EU) 833/2014 As part of the EU sanctions package related to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, the following article was added to Regulation (EU) 833/2014 by Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1269 of 27.04.2023: Article 5k(1) It shall be prohibited to award public contracts or concessions falling within the scope of the Directives on public procurement and of Article 10(1), (3), (6)(a) to (e), (8), (9) and (10) and Articles 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Directive 2014/23/EU, Article 7(a) to (d), Article 8, Article 10(b) to (f) and (h) to (j) of Directive 2014/24/EU, Article 18, Article 21(b) to (e) and (g) to (i), Articles 29 and 30 of Directive 2014/25/EU and Article 13(a) to (d), (f) to (h) and (j) of Directive 2009/81/EC to the following persons, entities or bodies: continue to perform contracts with such persons, entities or bodies:

  1. Russian nationals, natural persons resident in Russia or legal persons, entities or bodies established in Russia;
  2. legal persons, entities or bodies whose shares are held for more than 50 % directly or indirectly by one of the entities referred to in point (a), or (c) natural or legal persons, entities or bodies acting on behalf of or at the direction of any of the entities referred to in point (a) or (b), including where they represent more than 10 % of the contract value, subcontractors, suppliers or undertakings whose capacities are used within the meaning of the Public Procurement Directives.Please confirm that none of the above-mentioned exclusion grounds for a public procurement or concession award or a continuation of the contract applies to you and that you do not make any changes (e.g. by involving a subcontractor or a supplier) in the context of the execution of the contract that violate the aforementioned exclusion grounds? Please answer the question only with "YES" (→ Confirmation) or "NO" (→ no Confirmation).Minimum requirement: the question was answered ‘yes’. If the answer to the question is ‘no’, this shall lead to exclusion from the procurement procedure. You are aware that a knowingly incorrect indication of the declaration leads to exclusion from the procurement procedure and entitles the customer to extraordinary termination after conclusion of the contract. In the offer, only list the title of the criterion and your answer. Forgo the literal or analogous citation of the criterion.

2. Exclusion of a conflict of interest Confirm that neither you nor your partners in the case of a bidding community nor, if applicable, Do subcontractors have interests that are inconsistent with the performance of the services of this project and that may adversely affect the outcome of the project? This confirmation shall include the staff employed in the project. Please answer “YES” or “NO”. A conflict of interest exists, for example, if the creator of the protection profile is not technology-neutral.

Minimum requirement: If the question has been answered “no” (= there is a conflict of interest), explain the conflict and how you want to resolve it. In this case, the offer can only be considered if the described solution approach is assessed by the BSI as sufficient. In the offer, only list the title of the criterion and your answer. Forgo the literal or analogous citation of the criterion.

3. References Provide appropriate references of the companies involved. References are suitable if the projects on which the reference is based have essentially similar requirements for the undertakings in terms of technical and technical capacity as the tendered service. This is particularly the case with the present call for tender, experience in the creation of protection profiles according to the Common Criteria and extensive experience in the mentioned contexts.

These references must in particular demonstrate the ability of the participating companies in the field of IT security requirements. By means of the references, it must therefore be demonstrated that the participating companies have already gained experience in the following areas of experience:

  1. knowledge of the Common Criteria (CC) and the implementation of evaluation activities on IT systems or products on the basis of defined and CC-related evaluation criteria
  2. development of concepts in the area of IT security requirements
  3. projects and extensive practical experience in the contexts eID/sovereign documents and technical security facilities (TSE / SMAERS), 5G or FIDO
  4. Experience in projects related to crypto specifications When creating the reference proof, address the following points: − Client incl. specialist area − (detailed) presentation of the subject of the contract / activity − Scope / Affected experience area − Duration − Order volume The presentation should not exceed two A4 pages per reference project. No reference letters from previous clients are required.Minimum requirement: In total, at least three appropriate references shall be provided. All experience areas shall be supported by appropriate references, with one reference being used to cover several areas.

4. Quality management Please represent the quality management of your company. Please also provide information about certifications your company has acquired. Minimum requirement: Quality management is established and documented and can be proven.

2. Exclusion of a conflict of interest Confirm that neither you nor your partners in the case of a bidding community nor, if applicable, Do subcontractors have interests that are inconsistent with the performance of the services of this project and that may adversely affect the outcome of the project? This confirmation shall include the staff employed in the project. Please answer “YES” or “NO”.

A conflict of interest exists, for example, in the case of an obligation to or cooperation with the manufacturer of a product under investigation or due to another economic dependence on the said product. Minimum requirement: If the question has been answered “no” (= there is a conflict of interest), explain the conflict and how you want to resolve it. In this case, the offer can only be considered if the described solution approach is assessed by the BSI as sufficient. In the offer, only list the title of the criterion and your answer. Forgo the literal or analogous citation of the criterion.

3. References Provide appropriate references of the companies involved. References are suitable if the projects on which the reference is based have essentially similar requirements for the undertakings in terms of technical and technical capacity as the tendered service. This is particularly the case in this call for tender, in the case of experience in the development and development of projects in the field of network and information security or of encryption systems and their components.

The references mentioned must in particular demonstrate the ability of the participating companies in the field of evaluation in accordance with CC:2022.

By means of the references, it must therefore be demonstrated that the participating companies fulfil the following requirements: 1st CC Verifier: Due to the special nature of the services to be awarded, the contract can only be awarded to an EUCC Verifier (ITSEF high) approved during the entire project period, which meets the requirements for the technical domain “Smartcards and similar Devices” (TD SC).2 The tender shall contain a statement to that effect.

When creating the reference proof, go into the following points: − Client incl. specialist area − (detailed) presentation of the object of the order / activity − Scope / Area of experience affected − Duration − Order volume The presentation should not exceed two A4 pages per reference project. No reference letters from previous clients are required. Minimum requirement: demonstration of the requirement under 1. as CC verifier.

2. Exclusion of a conflict of interest Confirm that neither you nor your partners in the case of a bidding community nor, if applicable, Do subcontractors have interests that are inconsistent with the performance of the services of this project and that may adversely affect the outcome of the project? This confirmation shall include the staff employed in the project. Please answer “YES” or “NO”. A conflict of interest exists, for example, if the creator of the interface description is not technology-neutral.

Minimum requirement: If the question has been answered “no” (= there is a conflict of interest), explain the conflict and how you want to resolve it. In this case, the offer can only be considered if the described solution approach is assessed by the BSI as sufficient. In the offer, only list the title of the criterion and your answer. Forgo the literal or analogous citation of the criterion.

3. References Provide appropriate references of the companies involved. References are suitable if the projects on which the reference is based have essentially similar requirements for the undertakings in terms of technical and technical capacity as the tendered service. This is particularly the case in this call for tender, in the case of experience in the development and development of projects in the field of network and information security or of encryption systems and their components.

These references must demonstrate in particular the capacity of the participating companies in the field of research and development and the development and implementation of innovative solutions. By means of the references, it must therefore be demonstrated that the participating companies have already gained experience in the following areas of experience:

  1. development and documentation of technical interface specifications (API)
  2. projects and extensive practical experience of protocols and procedures in the contexts eID/sovereign documents and technical security facilities (TSE / SMAERS). Experience in the field of IT security, in particular protection against attacks by third parties
  3. projects in the field of client/server communication interfaces via REST, WebSocket, or similar
  4. Experience in the implementation and secure implementation of cryptographic algorithms and protocols, including the corresponding relevant specifications of recognized institutions
  5. Project experience in the field of conformity certification
  6. Several years of practical experience in the implementation of client/server interfaces in common programming languages and server frameworks When creating the reference proof, go into the following points: − Client incl. subject area − (detailed) presentation of the object of the order / activity − Scope / Affected experience area − Duration − Order volume The presentation should not exceed two A4 pages per reference project.No reference letters from previous clients are required. Minimum requirement: In total, at least three appropriate references shall be provided. All experience areas shall be supported by appropriate references, with one reference being used to cover several areas.
EXAMPLE — not a result for your companyCan you bid? Your readiness check

This is the SalesDots check: every condition in the notice, the company registers and your whole company profile — certificates with expiry dates, team, references and financials — in one place. The results below are an example; you see the real one after signing in.

12 met · 1 expiring · 2 missing · 2 to check

Conditions in this notice

  • Certificatescertificate in the profile, valid on the bid dateIn your profile
  • References3 matching references from the last 3 yearsIn your profile

Registers — checked automatically

  • Handelsregistercompany active, managing directors matchVerified
  • Transparenzregister (beneficial owners)entry matches the shareholdersVerified
  • Wettbewerbsregister (exclusions)no entry that excludes you from public contractsVerified
  • EU VAT (VIES)number active in VIESVerified
  • LEI (GLEIF)LEI issued and renewed, data matches the registerVerified
  • Sanctions screeningcompany and owners not listedVerified

Company profile — matched to the requirements

  • ISO/IEC 27001company certificate, validIn your profile
  • ISO 9001company certificate — renew before you bidExpires before the deadline
  • ISO 22301add it or bring in a consortium partnerNot in your profile yet
  • Project manager — PMP / PRINCE22 people, 5+ years of experienceIn your profile
  • Solution architect — TOGAFno certified personNot in your profile yet
  • IT references, last 3 years3 public-sector implementationsIn your profile
  • Turnover, last 3 yearsfrom financial statementsIn your profile
  • Partner status (Microsoft, SAP, Oracle)to confirm with the vendorNeeds a look
  • Security clearance (Poufne, NATO)to check in the teamNeeds a look
Check it against my company

Award criteria

The full criteria and their weights, as published in the notice.

For all lots

  • Quality

    See Chapter 6.2.1.5 of the specifications.

  • Price

    See Chapter 6.2.1.5 of the specifications.

The notice does not publish weights — see the tender documents.

Buyer

Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik

Address
53175 Bonn, Germany
Region (NUTS)
DEA22
Official contact address
[email protected]
The functional mailbox published in the notice. We never publish personal data.

Register identifiers

EU VAT
DE9910733568
Registration no. in the notice
991-07335-68

What this buyer bought before

135 IT contract award notices 2019–2026, €73.2m in total.

  • Projekt 1014: Security Automobillieferketten (AutoValueSec)

    Winner: Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. Institut für Optronik, Systemtechnik und Bildauswe…

    €157,053

    12 Oct 2026

  • P1013 SdT Editor

    Winner: cronn GmbH · 3 bids

    €297,143

    28 Sept 2026

  • Monitoring des Identitätsmanagements in Zusammenspiel mit EU-Informationssystemen basierend auf nationalen TR-03156 Fachlogdaten

    Winner: Process Intelligence Solutions GmbH · 2 bids

    €438,383

    28 Sept 2026

  • Durchführung von Sicherheitsanalysen und Evaluierungen an Produkten und Services sowie an Standards und Test-spezifikationen aus den Bereichen Consumer und Pub…

    Winner: OpenSource Security GmbH

    €452,232Framework agreement — maximum value

    25 Sept 2026

  • Projekt 1002: Smart Connectivity (SmaCo)

    Winner: GWT-TUD GmbH

    €331,127

    25 Sept 2026

  • Chip-Imaging zur Überprüfung von Software zur Generierung von Netzlisten

    Winner: IHP GmbH

    €226,129

    17 Jul 2026

How to submit an offer

Offers are submitted only on the buyer's platform, before the deadline for offers.

yes
Electronic submission
no
Electronic auction

Questions & answers

What is the deadline for offers in "Project 1025 CSP Update, Evaluation, Recertification and API (CUERA)"?

Offers are due by 3 Nov 2026, 10:00 CET. The deadline for offers was changed once: from 20 Oct 2026, 10:00 CEST to 3 Nov 2026, 10:00 CET. The newest notice applies.

What is the estimated value?

The buyer did not publish an estimated value in the notice.

Who is the buyer?

Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (Bonn, Germany).

Where and how do I submit an offer?

Offers are submitted electronically on www.evergabe-online.de.

Is the contract divided into lots?

Yes, into 3 lots.

How are offers scored?

quality, price.

Which procedure is used?

Open procedure.

Win it with SalesDots

Read the documents for you

SalesDots fetches the tender documents (or takes your upload when a platform does not allow it) and answers the two questions that matter first: what the buyer wants built, and what you must prove to take part, each with the exact quote and page.

Analyse documents

Match it with your profile

Every certificate, reference and role is checked against your company: green when you have it, amber when it expires before the deadline, grey when it needs a look.

Check my fit

Prepare your response

Turn the conditions into a bid checklist with owners and due dates, draft the questions to the buyer and keep the team on one plan.

Start a response

Never miss a change

Track the deadline, amendments and answers to clarification questions, and get similar tenders and re-tenders before they are published.

Track this tender

Source: Tenders Electronic Daily (TED), Official Journal of the EU. SalesDots is not the contracting authority; offers are submitted only through the buyer's platform. Data from the official notice, refreshed 23 Oct 2026, 21:06 CEST.