NGA broadband expansion in Spangenberg

The grantor awards a maximum of 75 points for the criterion "economic gap". The valuation shall be based on the economic gap specified by the bidder in the installation calculation of the economic gap (form F.2). The offer with the smallest economic gap (hereinafter "the best offer") receives the full score (75). For the remaining offers, the arithmetical difference in percent - based on the economic gap - to the best offer is determined. If a value of e.g. 10% results, then this offer receives 10% and thus 7.5 points less in the evaluation.

The grantor awards a maximum of 20 points for the criterion "Expansion and Outflow Planning". The evaluation shall be based on the quality and plausibility of the development and cash outflow planning submitted by the bidder. The evaluation is carried out in particular on the basis of the following criteria: - quarterly presentation of the main development and project milestones; - Presentation of the planned calls for funds and concept for compliance with the "year slices" envisaged by the Land of Hessen (see Part D.2); - Presentation of any project-relevant risks and planned countermeasures. - Date of full commissioning of the gigabit-capable high-performance network in calendar weeks from the entry into force of the grant agreement (cf. § 18.1) until the total commissioning of the gigabit network (to be entered in Form: F.1). Points are awarded on the basis of the following evaluation matrix: 20 points: The expansion and cash outflow planning is particularly comprehensible, realistic and compatible with the funding requirements. The planning does not show any visible weaknesses. 16 points: The expansion and cash outflow planning is comprehensible and largely plausible. Planning has only minor weaknesses. 12 points: The expansion and cash outflow planning is plausible overall, but has individual weaknesses or risks. 8 points: The expansion and cash outflow planning has recognizable weaknesses. The feasibility appears partially limited. 4 points: Development and cash outflo…

The grantor shall award a maximum of 5 points for the criterion "Alternative network technologies and laying methods" in accordance with the following criteria. The quality of the concept is decisive for the evaluation. The concept shall be limited to five pages. The quality of the concept is determined by whether and to what extent on the basis of the embodiments a fulfillment of the stated objectives—rapid and cost-effective establishment of a comprehensive NGA network—is to be expected. 5 points: The quality of the concept serves the goal in a special, exceptional way and has no weaknesses. 4 points: The quality of the concept serves the goal in a very good way and has no weaknesses. 3 points: The quality of the concept serves the goal in a good way and has no significant weaknesses with regard to the goal achievement. 2 points: The quality of the concept serves the goal in a satisfactory manner, but has weaknesses with regard to the goal achievement. 1 points: The quality of the concept is just sufficient for achieving the goal, but has major weaknesses in terms of achieving the goal. 0 points: The quality of the concept is insufficient for achieving goals.