Tenders

Castilla-La Mancha’s €72.2m cyber tender resets the field

Spain’s biggest cyber procurement sits in a thinly contested market, while Poland’s uKSC pipeline is producing low-bid-count opportunities for qualified suppliers.

SalesDots Team
19 min read
7 views
Share:
Castilla-La Mancha’s €72.2m cyber tender resets the field

Castilla-La Mancha has put €72.2m behind telecommunications and cybersecurity services, despite Spain accounting for 12 notices in this window. The buyer, Secretaría General de la Consejería de Hacienda, Administraciones Públicas y Transformación Digital de Castilla-La Mancha, is using its CiberReg initiative to build cyber-resilience through awareness, skills and a training laboratory. For suppliers, that makes this more than a connectivity requirement: it is a route into a regional capability programme.

The window contains 165 cybersecurity notices from 151 buyers across 19 countries. The Spain tender is the standout disclosed opportunity, but the sharper bid decision is geographic: Poland produced 70 notices at 2.1 bids on average, while Spain’s 4.3 and France’s 5 point to a materially more contested proposition.

165
tenders published
19 countries
151
buying organisations
52
awards published
2.6
average bids received
54% drew a single bid

Where this market is going

Cybersecurity’s coverage-neutral share is now 5.49%, a rise of 0.78 percentage points. The monthly path is lumpy rather than steady: 4.46% in 2025-09 rose to 4.98% in 2025-10, then fell through 4.4% in 2025-11 and 4.25% in 2025-12. It recovered to 4.44% in 2026-01, 4.71% in 2026-02, 4.78% in 2026-03 and 5.03% in 2026-04.

Momentum then accelerated to 5.84% in 2026-05 and 6.1% in 2026-06, before dropping to 5.55% in 2026-07 and recovering to 5.87% in 2026-08. That pattern supports pursuing active requirements, but not treating the current share as evidence of a smooth expansion in underlying demand.

Cybersecurity: share of all classified public IT tenders

Share, not volume. Monthly, last 12 complete months.

3.9 5.2 6.4 5.87% 25-09: 4.46 %25-10: 4.98 %25-11: 4.40 %25-12: 4.25 %26-01: 4.44 %26-02: 4.71 %26-03: 4.78 %26-04: 5.03 %26-05: 5.84 %26-06: 6.10 %26-07: 5.55 %26-08: 5.87 %25-0925-1126-0126-0326-0526-0726-08
Share is used deliberately: raw counts track how much of the market we harvested, not how much of it exists. Only a change in share is a market signal.

Where the tenders were published

Notices by buyer country, 7 days to 2026-09-28.

PL: 70 tenders PL 70 2.1 bids avgUA: 18 tenders UA 18DE: 17 tenders DE 17 3.5 bids avgCZ: 17 tenders CZ 17 2.7 bids avgES: 12 tenders ES 12 4.3 bids avgFR: 8 tenders FR 8 5 bids avgPT: 3 tenders PT 3 1 bids avgDK: 2 tenders DK 2SI: 2 tenders SI 2LT: 2 tenders LT 2 1 bids avg

How hard the competition is

The 52 awards measured show 2.6 bids on average, but the country split is the commercial signal. Poland sits at 2.1 bids, Czechia at 2.7 and Germany at 3.5; Spain reaches 4.3 and France 5. In France and Spain, assume that technical differentiation and demonstrable delivery quality decide whether a bid gets through a crowded field, even though price is the stated award criterion in 70 notices and quality in 16. In Poland and Czechia, the constraint is more likely to be qualification, credible staffing and delivery capacity than price alone.

This is not a market dominated by wide-open contests. Single-bid awards account for 54%, while SMEs are the winning bidder in 84%. Incumbency, local eligibility and the ability to mobilise matter more than a blended bid average suggests. A large supplier should use its references to clear qualification barriers; an SME should not assume that low bid counts mean an easy price-led sale.

How these contracts are awarded

Stated award criterion, for the tenders that declared one.

price: 70 (79%) quality: 16 (18%) cost: 3 (3%)
price 79% quality 18% cost 3%
Tenders that did not state a criterion are excluded from this split.

What is driving it

Poland’s uKSC is the immediate procurement trigger, cited in 34 tenders in this window. The amended act creates national cybersecurity requirements across covered sectors and a registration route for key and important entities, so it is producing both product procurement and compliance work. Its tender references reached 273 in the latest 30 days, against 227 in the previous 30 days. Elsewhere, NIS2 held at 3 references in both periods; DPM 2.0 moved to 2 from 0; CBAM moved to 1 from 0; and DORA fell to 0 from 1.

The next compliance-led cyber work sits in financial data and identity controls. The Solvency II Review requires revised reporting and risk frameworks to be transposed by 29 January 2027 and applies from 30 January 2027. Bank Account Registries and BARIS require national mechanisms capable of identifying account holders, with expanded register scope applying from 10 July 2027 and Commission interconnection due by 10 July 2029. The EU AML Package also applies from 10 July 2027. These are chiefly compliance and integration programmes, but they create product demand where access control, identity verification, auditability and protected data exchange are in scope.

Regulations named in live tenders

Tenders citing each framework, last 30 days.

Ustawa o krajowym systemie cyberbezpieczeństwa (uKSC): 273 tenders Ustawa o krajowym systemiecyberbezpieczeństwa (uKSC) 273NIS2 (Directive 2022/2555): 3 tenders NIS2 (Directive 2022/2555) 3DPM 2.0 (EBA/EIOPA Data Point Model): 2 tenders DPM 2.0 (EBA/EIOPA Data Point Model) 2CBAM (Regulation 2023/956): 1 tenders CBAM (Regulation 2023/956) 1DORA (Regulation 2022/2554): 0 tenders DORA (Regulation 2022/2554) 0
Counted by matching published notices to the platform’s public regulatory register.

The calendar ahead

DateFrameworkMilestoneWhere
2027-01-29Solvency II Review (Directive 2025/2)transposition deadlineEU
2027-01-30Solvency II Review (Directive 2025/2)applies fromEU
2027-07-10Bank Account Registries + BARIS (AMLD6 2024/1640 art. 16)applies fromEU
2027-07-10EU AML Package (AMLR 2024/1624 + AMLA 2024/1620)applies fromEU

What shifted this week

Demand by type of work, against its own 12-week average

Percentage difference from the same vertical’s recent baseline.

support maintenance: +64% support maintenance +64%managed services: +30% managed services +30%custom development: +14% custom development +14%hardware supply: -21% hardware supply -21%licenses saas: -22% licenses saas -22%system implementation: -25% system implementation -25%consulting advisory: -35% consulting advisory -35%
A 12-week baseline inside the same vertical, so a change here is a change in mix rather than in our coverage.

Whose technology is being named

Fortinet is named in 7 notices across 2 countries, 27% above its 12-week average of 5.5. Check Point is the stronger upward mover, appearing in 5 notices across 4 countries, 107% above its 12-week average of 2.4. Those are openings, particularly where buyers are refreshing security estates and support arrangements. Cisco appears in 1 notice in 1 country, against a 12-week average of 1.3, but has no calculated movement figure in the data.

Palo Alto Networks is the displacement story: 1 notice in 1 country, 59% below its 12-week average of 2.4. Put Fortinet’s 7 notices beside the named Castilla-La Mancha telecommunications and cybersecurity tender, but do not mistake that for evidence of a Fortinet role: the tender record does not name a vendor. Fortinet does have a product-level public-sector signal at Bracknell Forest Borough Council, where the researched notice names FortiGate firewalls, switches, support and subscriptions. Repeat demand is also concentrated: Miejskie Wodociągi i Kanalizacja w Bydgoszczy appears in 5 tenders and Nemocnice TGM Hodonín in 4, making both useful accounts for partner and renewal mapping.

Vendors named in this window’s tenders

Notices naming each vendor, with movement against the same vertical’s 12-week average.

fortinet: 7 tenders fortinet 7 +27% vs usualcheck point: 5 tenders check point 5 +107% vs usualcisco: 1 tenders cisco 1palo alto networks: 1 tenders palo alto networks 1 -59% vs usual
A vendor named in a tender specification is not the winner of it. Incumbency, compatibility requirements and reference architectures all put a name in the text.

Who is buying repeatedly

TendersBuyerCountryExample
5Miejskie Wodociągi i Kanalizacja w Bydgoszczy - spółka z o.o.PLPoland – Computer equipment and supplies – Dostawa, wdrożenie, uruchomienie, konfiguracja urządzeń będących el
4Nemocnice TGM Hodonín, příspěvková organizaceCZCzechia – Software package and information systems – Zvýšení kybernetické bezpečnosti Nemocnice TGM Hodonín –
2Національний Банк УкраїниUAПрограмна продукція для моніторингу, керування та забезпечення безпеки IT-інфраструктури з функцією керування
2Instytut Chemii Bioorganicznej Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Poznańskie Centrum Superkomputerowo-SieciowePLPoland – Software package and information systems – Przedmiotem zamówienia jest modernizacja systemu zabezpiec
2Compras de la Corporación de Radio y Televisión Española S.A.ESSpain – Software-related services – Mantenimiento y suscripción de licencias antivirus
2HLAVNÍ MĚSTO PRAHACZCzechia – Information systems and servers – Zajištění obnovy licencí pro technologii Rapid7
2Gmina Miejska DzierżoniówPLDostawa urządzeń informatycznych: stacja robocza 2 szt., monitor zakrzywiony 4 szt., tablet polowy 1 szt.
2Державна податкова служба УкраїниUAПослуга з проведення авторизації з безпеки інформаційно-комунікаційної системи «Автоматизована система роботи

An organisation running several tenders in one window is usually working through a programme rather than buying once.

The biggest tenders

The disclosed values cover only the 52 notices that published a value in EUR, not the size of the market. Castilla-La Mancha leads with €72.2m for telecommunications and cybersecurity services linked to CiberReg. Clean Hydrogen Joint Undertaking has a €15m managed IT services framework for itself and other EU Joint Undertakings, covering IT operations and cybersecurity services. SAS pass Culture is buying a €7m remote identity-verification solution; SURF B.V. has a €6.89m Security Incident Response 2.0 framework, fitting its security support role for Dutch education and research; and Sociedad Andaluza para el Desarrollo de las Telecomunicaciones has a €2.64m framework for an advanced protection solution.

ValueTenderBuyerCountry
€72.2mSpain – Telephone and data transmission services – Servicios de Telecomunicaciones y Ciberseguridad de la Administración de Castilla-La ManchaSecretaría General de la Consejería de Hacienda, Administraciones Públicas y Transformación Digital de la Junta de ComunES
€15.0mBelgium, Luxembourg – IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support – MANAGED IT SERVICES 2026 (framework)Clean Hydrogen Joint UndertakingBE
€7.0mFrance – Security software package – Fourniture, déploiement et TMA d'une solution de vérification d'identité à distance pour l'application Pass CultureSAS pass CultureFR
€6.9mNetherlands – IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support – Security Incident Response 2.0 (2026) (framework)SURF B.V.NL
€2.6mSpain – Software package and information systems – ACUERDO MARCO PARA EL SUMINISTRO, IMPLANTACIÓN, Y SOPORTE DE UNA SOLUCIÓN DE SEGURIDAD AVANZADA CON FUNCIONALIDADES DE PROTECCIÓN (framework)Sociedad Andaluza para el Desarrollo de las Telecomunicaciones, S.A.ES
€1.3mFrance – Preventive maintenance services – Accord-cadre extension, maintenance du dispositif de vidéoprotection (framework)Mairie de Niort (Service marchés publics)FR
€625kPortugal – Data-processing machines (hardware) – AQUISIÇÃO DE FIREWALLS PARA REFORÇO DA CIBERSEGURANÇA DOS SISTEMAS E APLICAÇÕES FERROVIÁRIASInfraestruturas de Portugal, SAPT
€525kIreland – Information technology services – Firewall and Associated Services 2026Irish Wheelchair Association (IWA)IE

Values as published by the buyer, for the 52 of 165 tenders in this window that stated one in EUR.

Deadlines worth watching

ClosesTenderBuyerCountry
2026-09-30France – Security software package – Fourniture, déploiement et TMA d'une solution de vérification d'identité à distance pour l'application Pass CultureSAS pass CultureFR
2026-10-01Код ДК 021:2015- 48730000-4 - Пакети програмного забезпечення для забезпечення безпеки (Програмна продукція)Державна установа "Центр обслуговування підрозділів Національної поліції України"UA
2026-10-07Програмна продукція для підсистеми захисту DNS (за кодом ДК 021:2015 (СPV) «Єдиний закупівельний словник» - 48730000-4 Пакети програмного забезпечення для забезСПЕЦІАЛІЗОВАНЕ КОМУНАЛЬНЕ ПІДПРИЄМСТВО "КИЇВТЕЛЕСЕРВІС"UA
2026-10-10Інші послуги у сфері інформатизації, а саме поновлення ліцензій, сервісів підписки, баз, сігнатур для апаратних міжмережевих екранів Fortigate на 1 рікДЕПАРТАМЕНТ ІНФОРМАЦІЇ ТА ЦИФРОВИХ РІШЕНЬ ОДЕСЬКОЇ МІСЬКОЇ РАДИUA
2026-10-10Пакети програмного забезпечення для забезпечення безпеки (ДК 021:2015: 48730000-4 Пакети програмного забезпечення для забезпечення безпеки)ДЕРЖАВНЕ БЮРО РОЗСЛІДУВАНЬUA
2026-10-11Послуги з продовження ліцензії (підписка на оновлення сигнатур та сервісної підтримки) для FortiGate 400F, FortiGate 100F, FortiGate 60F, FortiAnalyzer-300G та Державне підприємство "Державний експертний центр Міністерства охорони здоров'я України"UA
2026-10-11Закупівля послуги з гарантійного обслуговування міжмережевих екранів Check PointДержавне підприємство "Мультимедійна платформа іномовлення України"UA
2026-10-12Технічна підтримка програмних складових комплексу запобігання витоку інформації, 2 лоти: лот 1 - технічна підтримка програмних складових комплексу запобігання вНаціональний Банк УкраїниUA

Who won

Suppliers with the most awards this window

Awards published in the window, by named winner.

Nomios Poland Sp. z o.o.: 2 awards Nomios Poland Sp. z o.o. 2ACD IT sp. z o. o.: 1 awards ACD IT sp. z o. o. 1ASECPRO s.r.o.: 1 awards ASECPRO s.r.o. 1Akrivia Sp. z o.o.: 1 awards Akrivia Sp. z o.o. 1ARHS DEVELOPMENTS SA: 1 awards ARHS DEVELOPMENTS SA 1Aricoma Systems a.s.: 1 awards Aricoma Systems a.s. 1Advanced Business Systems sp. z o. o.: 1 awards Advanced Business Systems sp. z o. o. 1AB Systems sp. z o.o.: 1 awards AB Systems sp. z o.o. 1

Sources consulted

Pages the writer read for context while drafting this column. The figures above come from the notices, not from these.

Bid teams should prioritise Polish uKSC accounts where qualification can suppress competition, while treating Castilla-La Mancha and the financial-regulatory calendar as longer-cycle pursuits requiring a partner, delivery and compliance story before the formal procedure starts.

Method

Built from 165 public procurement notices published between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-28, classified into the Cybersecurity vertical. Every figure on this page is computed from those notices; the commentary is written around them. Sources: bzp, ted, prozorro. Tenders featured in earlier editions of this column are excluded from the named lists above.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is cybersecurity’s current share of procurement notices?

Cybersecurity represents 5.49% of the classified corpus, up 0.78 percentage points.

Which countries have the most competitive cybersecurity bids?

France averages 5 bids and Spain 4.3, compared with Germany at 3.5, Czechia at 2.7 and Poland at 2.1.

How much disclosed cybersecurity tender value is in the window?

The 52 notices publishing EUR values account for €108.6m, with a median value of €512,500.

#security
#public-procurement
#tenders
#market-data

Enjoyed this article?

Get more insights on AI-powered sales intelligence delivered to your inbox.